How much I would love to delve into the deep pool of contemplation in regard to esthetics, but that can’t be today’s task. I have other priorities, and I have to do as I promised; try to achieve those unattainable answers.
I’m not sure if this applies but I had an interesting encounter today, perhaps he’s even reading this now, and laughing at the inclusion. Either way, it wasn’t the actual encounter itself, but the encounter’s encounter with my brother that resonated. I was asked to have an interview. At first, I was slightly skeptical. He was an older man, a “writer”, curious about some young, foreign girl. Yea, that could be taken the wrong way, but once I relaxed a bit, I really sensed no intrusion, no negative intentions, it was just an interview. He seemed inherently interested in what he was writing about (foreign immersion in China) and I have to say, I think it’s a brilliant, untouched topic.
My brother, however, did not. I proceeded to go along with this interview, and honestly, there was really nothing to hold back. I have nothing to hide, I am who I am, and I don’t really care who knows it. No, I didn’t jump into any horrific, vivid memories of my past, but I’ve lead a relatively adventurous life, and it seemed he had as well. All of that mixed in with Chinese culture and western philosophy, well it made for interesting conversation, and I left feeling the need to write.
Towards the end of the interview, I had called my brother over to say hello to the interviewer. I almost knew how he would react, and it was as if I wanted an outsiders opinion on just how different he and I are. I wanted someone (someone who seemed to have lived similarly to the way I want to live) to provide a view of my brother. I needed an answer. I know what I think of him, and of course, I love him, but that doesn’t mean I want to be him. This is especially palpable in terms of my relationship with my father, who is incapable of recognizing the differences between my brother and I. My dad is is so convinced that I’m a flake with no sense of direction, or even capability, that the second something gets difficult I will just give up and become my mother. I don’t know how to show him who I am, and still, at the same time, be accepted. It’s a strange dilemma, one I will probably be fishing through until I’m out of college, but anyway, in this situation, I did receive the end result I was looking for.
My brother protruded in his way, butting in on the conversation, searching for the man’s credentials, connections, and past employment. He was searching for the things he sees as the valuable attributes in a person, things that generally have nothing to do with who the person actually is. At least, in terms of how I see people. I’ve discussed this, gone over it, professed my view on the arbitrary nature of judging human worth and value, and well everyone has their purpose, and reason. I can judge myself, and expect things of myself, but I can never really expect anything from another person. It has to be their decision, always their decision, but the interviewer seemed a bit sardonic towards my brother, the way I sometimes see him. Like you’re talking to someone who is speaking a completely different language, not even language, someone who is interested in a completely different world, a completely different life, and its just offensive to have them push their demeanor onto your solitude. Yea, he can be a bit obtrusive and overwhelming at times.
Anyway, I got what I was looking for. The man looked at my brother and me, and recognized how truly different we are. I was pleased. I’m not the only one.
It was interesting, as my brother walked away, he kept making ridiculous hand gestures behind the man’s back, trying to pull me away from the conversation. When he realized I wasn’t interested in his opinion, I got a nasty text insulting my discretion and judgment of character. I responded smugly, “Ok”, and let it go. Its that kind of thing that is not worth getting worked up over. I love my brother for who he is, and that’s that. I want nothing more, nothing less. I can be who I am, and he will always be who he is, and it is my job, as someone who loves him, to accept as he is, for all he is and wishes to be.
Which leads into my answer:
It would seem from such encounters that it would be unnecessary to love people that are outside your own realm of thought, people that exist to exist, but don’t exist within your own world. I can’t say I just love my brother because he is my brother. Blood, of course, plays a factor, for if it weren’t for blood, I doubt I would ever even acknowledge him, but then, once you get past the biological aspect, there is a need to belong. You will always belong to your family doubtless of who they are, what they do, or how they isolate you because they are your blood. It’s a completely animalistic/instinctual need, like maternal instinct, or attraction. Its part of who you are and rejecting part of yourself seems like the quickest way to succumb to a dead life. So in a sense, family members are slightly exempt from this discussion. In many ways, however, they very much apply.
It seems my main query is, can love itself be wrong? We’ve all loved someone who has hurt, or betrayed us, rejected us, and all that cliché crap Hollywood makes so much money off of. But it just brings into question, are all people capable of love and if only some are capable of love, are those who are incapable worthy of love, and thus forgiveness? I do not mean forgiveness in a religious sense, just to make that very clear. Forgiveness can be applied to anything, especially in regard to betrayal we’ve all felt by a loved one, that’s what I’m referring to. It seems this topic is inextricably linked to the idea of human worth but of course, none of us are perfect, and thus none of us are completely humane.
Just to portray this a little more clearly, I found myself in a sticky situation a few days ago. I’ve deemed my primary goal in life is the pursuit of goodness and love, and yet I feel like I committed the most sinister of acts the other day and I feel the utmost guilt, when I didn’t inherently do anything. I was walking down a crowded street in Wudaokou, a place littered with rabid amounts of people, bicycles, venders, and of course, there are beggars that speckle the streets in tune with the rest of the madness. Some them perform to try and earn more money, and normally, I’ll drop a yen, or whatever, and think nothing of it, most of them have the same routine, etc. But on this particular day, it was different. I walked past a man sitting on an amplifier, and then my eyes turned to the small child sitting on a dirty blanket, playing with some kind of toy. The child’s hair was mostly fallen out, and he had some sort of disease/rash so that his scalp itself was red and peeling, and looked almost ridged, and where the ridges met, there were puffy yellow/white lines. His arms and legs were mainly covered by clothes, but his forearms showed similar signs of the disease. Once I got past his primary appearance, his mannerism was what scared me the most. He looked sick. He wasn’t playing with his toy, he was clutching it. Holding it fast against him, as if it was some kind of keepsake of life. I wondered if he was dying and if he was dying, if he knew he was dying. I felt my eyes widen in horror, and turned back to the father, or who I presumed to be the father, and realized he was just as plagued as his ward. I felt sickened, and I sped up to be rid of them, of the sight of them, that blemish on my everyday pleasant monotony. It wasn’t until later that I felt sick with guilt– and wonder. How much I wanted to reach out to those people, but how afraid I was to actually risk myself. Does this make me selfish? Or just unaware? I went back later and dropped all the money I had in the basket. I guess that could be deemed a stupid action, but oh well. It really didn’t do anything for my conscience. The whole scenario still upsets me, I can’t really explain why. Maybe it’s because I really have no power to do anything, yet at the same time, I have all the power in the world. And there are just so many people that need help, and I don’t know how to save them.
This event made me think, made me think a lot. More so than usual. It seemed interesting that if we were all equal, evolution would be impossible, it just wouldn’t exist. Of course, there are those who think evolution is a farce, but thats not the point. Anyway, when it comes down to it, and those sick people on the street, we are NOT all biologically equal. I was not born with AIDS or cancer, while no doubt, some person with the same birthday as me, from the same hospital is already dead from some awful plague. In this sense, biology and genetic makeup deem the next generations, but its also seemingly linked to the idea that love itself, or love of someone unworthy inherently inhibits us just as much. In a sense, I don’t think this is true, or at least I think its capable of being overcome.
There are countless people (we all know them), who commit acts of goodness in order to appease their own conscience or to seek some kind of appreciation, or commencement. I am convinced we are all supposed to maintain a certain level of self-love, one that allows us to function in the manner we deem permissible, but at the same, it would seem that to commit an act of selflessness in order to be gratified by acknowledgement is very not a selfless act, but a selfish one. There’s a personal goal at the end; self-gratificiation. I think love itself is meant to be selfless, and thus the idea of self-love can not be contradicted by loving a selfish person. Loving a person does not entail they love you back. As I said before, you can only expect anything from yourself, hopefully the best you have to offer, and thus the love you perform can only be as true as you allow it to be. It has nothing to do with the other person’s faults or actions. People will always be selfish, its human nature. It’s pulling away from that faculty that actually allows you to trust someone, to love someone, to live life. Selfishness only inhibits you, love itself, acceptance allows you to grow.
The problem is that there is not exact definition for love (as I said before). We can’t deem what is inherently irrational to truly exist in a rational world, so how do we know the feelings we perceive are actually love? Well, my only answer to this is that language itself is limiting, and it seems the human mind is limited (in a sense of communication) as to what we can profess in words, and there are only so many words. Poetry itself seems to be the closest form of actual profession of emotion into human language, as it is often impossible to truly define. Poetry provides lyrical emotion, literate emotion that can be sensed, felt, and experienced in ways that regular language, literature cannot. It also seems that imitation itself has to be broken before the actual goal can be achieved or performed. In this society, it is impossible to not be affected by the chaotic world surrounding us, and thus create an idea of what life and love should look like. We get stuck inside Nietzsche’s traditional lying, without even awareness that we’re doing it. We think we’re pulling out of this global box, when in fact we’re just committing the same crime as the previous person, going in a similar direction, the safe direction.
Well, for me at least, this was an extreme light bulb, because this predicament implies that the only way to actually know love is to trust yourself, something so opposed and berated out of us by modern society. We are expected not to be ourselves even if we know what we want, just being around other people, being pulled into their standards and sanctions, we get pulled away from our own directions. We lose sight of ourselves as other people, laws, guidance, medication, all the derogatory, negative aspects of life beat us down, until we are so worn out, you can no longer trust yourself to be yourself, because it is so much safer to be someone else. This is incredibly ironic for me, being here, in this “Communist” society that inherently renounces all the actual beliefs that Marx tried to convey (I have no doubt he’s turning in his grave…). Ha, I find it unbelievably amusing in a way.
So, I suppose this is my answer. I maintain that same inner voice whispering to me not to fret, to trust my own judgment and be strong in my criticism of life itself. It is up to every person to judge who in fact is worthy of their love, their time, their life. Randomly, I heard a heart-wrenching story today from the most random person on earth, and all it made me feel was utter gratitude for the people I do have in my life, the people I can cherish. Mayhap I have experienced severe heartache, mayhap not, but it is my growth from those experiences, however I deem them, however they affected me, and in turn how I allowed myself to grow and heal from them. Its realization from this growth that lets you realize nothings really changed. It’s the goal to live in the Sartrean “good faith”, and to recognize life for its possibilities and not its hardships. The love I felt did not die, it’s still very much alive inside me, in my mind, heart, wherever it is emotion actually takes place. So I will continue to live this ideal, to trust myself, and therefore trust those I deem worthy of trust. To expect the highest I can from myself, and hopefully, inherently, affect those around me in a way that will be ultimately good.
And so I close. I read a long time ago Into the Wild, the story of Christopher McCandless, and his beautiful/terrifying journey to and through the Alaskan territory. Sadly, McCandless died very young, and even more so, he died alone. It seemed his whole life he lived for the pursuit of solitude and isolation, like Thoreau or even Byron, but it is McCandless’s acknowledgement at the time of his death that makes him so worthy of notice. “Happiness is meant to be shared”, he wrote, and in a sense, its ironic (yet very fitting) that a man so set on isolation can only realize at the time of his death the true purpose of life. I suppose its hard to truly recognize what you need until you’ve lost it. Hopefully, we might all learn from this realization, and recognize happiness can be achieved. Maybe it can even be achieved in solitude, but the concept of solitude itself is sad. Life is meant to be shared, happiness is meant to be shared, and these two concepts only coincide in love, love for others, and the world around us. Being alone is a very horrible, lonely fate, one I would not wish on anyone. Rilke, more so than anyone, seemed to be the only writer I have acknowledged that recognized the need for support in one’s personal isolation. We all need our introverted speculation, but it is when you escape from your isolation in the familiarity of those around you that you truly know you are loved. To honor someones isolation, and need for solitude, loving the actual distance. I guess this is a relatively different topic.
Anyway, there’s my answer. For now, at least.